<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MRM</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mrm-london.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mrm-london.com</link>
	<description>Your reputation is valuable. We help you take care of it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Salsa your way into creative blue jeans usage with the Friday links&#8230; by JESS3</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2010/03/salsa-your-way-into-creative-blue-jeans-usage-with-the-friday-links/comment-page-1/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>JESS3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrm-london.com/?p=1700#comment-318</guid>
		<description>And, MRM, JESS3 salutes you in return :) Don&#039;t hesitate to reach out, we&#039;d love to work with you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, MRM, JESS3 salutes you in return <img src='http://www.mrm-london.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Don&#8217;t hesitate to reach out, we&#8217;d love to work with you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Good will hunting: The end of &#8216;CSR&#8217; as we know it&#8230;? by David Connor</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2010/02/good-will-hunting-the-end-of-csr-as-we-know-it/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>David Connor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mrm-london.com/?p=1475#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Businesses will always fall into either the &#039;talking good&#039;, &#039;doing good&#039; and unfortunately too few in the  &#039;are good&#039; categories. I know that&#039;s a gross over simplification but it&#039;s also a scarily accurate summary.

CSR, or I should say, the perception of CSR has improved dramatically over the past few years as is emerging reinforced as a mainstream management approach to improve profitability, not just the naive marketing lead and  ultimately superficial initiatives that gave the ethos a bad name.

The arrival of the internet was key in an earlier step change in CSR&#039;s evolution by suddenly making available additional information about corporate activity to those who went looking for it. Social media is providing another step change for CSR as this information is now being pushed at everybody online, every minute of the day. It&#039;s fun watching traditional PR departments failing miserably to manage a crisis unfolding in real time via Twitter etc without the ability to hide behind the control that press releases and traditional paper based journalism gave them.

A new era of transparency? Maybe. A new era of enlightened media management? Definitely.

Anybody need a CSR training course for media professionals?? I know a man that can help :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses will always fall into either the &#8216;talking good&#8217;, &#8216;doing good&#8217; and unfortunately too few in the  &#8216;are good&#8217; categories. I know that&#8217;s a gross over simplification but it&#8217;s also a scarily accurate summary.</p>
<p>CSR, or I should say, the perception of CSR has improved dramatically over the past few years as is emerging reinforced as a mainstream management approach to improve profitability, not just the naive marketing lead and  ultimately superficial initiatives that gave the ethos a bad name.</p>
<p>The arrival of the internet was key in an earlier step change in CSR&#8217;s evolution by suddenly making available additional information about corporate activity to those who went looking for it. Social media is providing another step change for CSR as this information is now being pushed at everybody online, every minute of the day. It&#8217;s fun watching traditional PR departments failing miserably to manage a crisis unfolding in real time via Twitter etc without the ability to hide behind the control that press releases and traditional paper based journalism gave them.</p>
<p>A new era of transparency? Maybe. A new era of enlightened media management? Definitely.</p>
<p>Anybody need a CSR training course for media professionals?? I know a man that can help <img src='http://www.mrm-london.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Sean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t comment if I want the IFA population decimated for selfish business reasons ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t comment if I want the IFA population decimated for selfish business reasons <img src='http://www.mrm-london.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Hilary Morison</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary Morison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-37</guid>
		<description>Fingers crossed RDR doesn&#039;t end up decimating the IFA population and the profession finds a new lease of life in attracting new blood thanks to a new professional standing akin to lawyers and accountants...all eyes on Jan 2013, eh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fingers crossed RDR doesn&#8217;t end up decimating the IFA population and the profession finds a new lease of life in attracting new blood thanks to a new professional standing akin to lawyers and accountants&#8230;all eyes on Jan 2013, eh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Sean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Hilary,

The RDR will change the adviser demographic. 

I took my Diploma exams last ..the other people taking them were younger &amp; there were many more women than you normally see amongst groupings of IFAs.

The RDR is basically to make financial services more professional...eg better trained  advisers with higher qualifications not just insecure sales people obsessed with cars.

When Civil partnerships came in, I went to see the leader of a gay  organisation in Swindon to have a chat about financial planning &amp; civil partnerships.

He pointed out there would be fewer civil partnerships than expected because gay men enjoyed the single lifestyle...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hilary,</p>
<p>The RDR will change the adviser demographic. </p>
<p>I took my Diploma exams last ..the other people taking them were younger &amp; there were many more women than you normally see amongst groupings of IFAs.</p>
<p>The RDR is basically to make financial services more professional&#8230;eg better trained  advisers with higher qualifications not just insecure sales people obsessed with cars.</p>
<p>When Civil partnerships came in, I went to see the leader of a gay  organisation in Swindon to have a chat about financial planning &amp; civil partnerships.</p>
<p>He pointed out there would be fewer civil partnerships than expected because gay men enjoyed the single lifestyle&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Hilary Morison</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary Morison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-35</guid>
		<description>All good points. 

I think it is an issue that warrants further discussion, particularly around the subject of access to independent financial advice for all, free of prejudice or &#039;conservatism&#039; - not least now that Civil Parnerships, to my understanding, rightly confer the same spousal transfer of assets rights to same sex married couples that heterosexual married couples enjoy. I would have thought that this area of tax planning and provision of life assurance to safeguard partners (irrespective of whether there are children) would be a burgeoning area for advisers in this context...

Do you think that IFA demographic is genuinely a hurdle? And if so, how do you overcome it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good points. </p>
<p>I think it is an issue that warrants further discussion, particularly around the subject of access to independent financial advice for all, free of prejudice or &#8216;conservatism&#8217; &#8211; not least now that Civil Parnerships, to my understanding, rightly confer the same spousal transfer of assets rights to same sex married couples that heterosexual married couples enjoy. I would have thought that this area of tax planning and provision of life assurance to safeguard partners (irrespective of whether there are children) would be a burgeoning area for advisers in this context&#8230;</p>
<p>Do you think that IFA demographic is genuinely a hurdle? And if so, how do you overcome it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Sean Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-34</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting question.

When we&#039;ve talked about Critical Illness, myself &amp; clients have studied the policy small print about HIV/AIDS. It has not stopped them taking up the protection

In society in general people are not as conscious of death &amp; disease as in the past. People live longer and survive cancer &amp; heart disease. People do not feel as &quot;mortal&quot; as in the past when everybody died younger and  did not survive the critical illnesses.

Usually gay &amp; lesbian people do not have children. Protection is often sold on the basis that it will help look after the children.

Another reason that might explain why protection is less common in the gay community is that the majority of Financial Advisers are 50+, male &amp; rather conservative...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting question.</p>
<p>When we&#8217;ve talked about Critical Illness, myself &amp; clients have studied the policy small print about HIV/AIDS. It has not stopped them taking up the protection</p>
<p>In society in general people are not as conscious of death &amp; disease as in the past. People live longer and survive cancer &amp; heart disease. People do not feel as &#8220;mortal&#8221; as in the past when everybody died younger and  did not survive the critical illnesses.</p>
<p>Usually gay &amp; lesbian people do not have children. Protection is often sold on the basis that it will help look after the children.</p>
<p>Another reason that might explain why protection is less common in the gay community is that the majority of Financial Advisers are 50+, male &amp; rather conservative&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on When the protection gap becomes a chasm&#8230; by Hilary</title>
		<link>http://www.mrm-london.com/2009/11/when-the-protection-gap-becomes-a-chasm/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 15:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mrm.base-dev.com/?p=984#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Hi Sean, afraid I don&#039;t have anything more &#039;scientific&#039; than the conversations I had with a number of the respondents but it seems to stem from a general and deep seated distrust of the insurance industry. When asked specifically why that was the case it usually came down to the industry&#039;s discriminatory treatment of gay men looking to get life cover in the 80s because they were deemed to be a higher risk because of HIV/Aids - something which is still prevalent among a number of insurers who continue to treat gay men in civil partnerships as single and as such a higher risk.  This distrust cuts across all product areas, including pet and travel insurance. Does this tally with your own understanding of the market/take up of insurance among gay men and women?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Sean, afraid I don&#8217;t have anything more &#8217;scientific&#8217; than the conversations I had with a number of the respondents but it seems to stem from a general and deep seated distrust of the insurance industry. When asked specifically why that was the case it usually came down to the industry&#8217;s discriminatory treatment of gay men looking to get life cover in the 80s because they were deemed to be a higher risk because of HIV/Aids &#8211; something which is still prevalent among a number of insurers who continue to treat gay men in civil partnerships as single and as such a higher risk.  This distrust cuts across all product areas, including pet and travel insurance. Does this tally with your own understanding of the market/take up of insurance among gay men and women?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
